EXHIBITS

This exhibit was created by a USU student. (learn more...)

Constructing Women's Reputations: Gender and the Public Self: A Brief History of Reputation Construction

Array ( [0] => ENGL 6330 Spring 2018 [1] => no-show [2] => student exhibit )

“NOTIONS of honour and reputation were ubiquitous and important in early modern England for a variety of reasons. They were part and parcel of how individuals in this society conceived of the relationship between the personal and the public, and between the projection and the perception of one's character. More particularly, they lay at the heart of two crucial issues: how people thought about social status, and about the differences between men and women.”

—Faramerz Dabhiowala, “The Construction of Honour, Reputation and Status in Late Seventeenth- and Early Eighteenth-Century England," 201

Fable of Genius, Virtue, and Reputation.jpg
A representation of Aesops's fable of Genius, Virtue, and Reputation. Virtue and Genius talking to Reputation on the right. 

Throughout the 1700s, how a person should build a reputation and how a reputation was actually constructed often contradicted each other. Even though discussions about reputation construction go as far back as Aesop’s fable of Genius, Virtue, and Reputation, there was not a clear or followed how-to guide for building a reputation. Faramerz Dabhiowala explains that reputations were central to “how people thought about social status, and about the differences between men and women,” but reputations tended to focus on the surface instead of the depth of the individual. If someone had a good reputation, it typically meant that they were from a high social class and that they fit into the gender roles prescribed for them.  Dabhiowala explains that reputations were considered a “compound of moral and social factors," but the focus tended to be on the social factors. [1] 

A supposed prerequisite for a woman to have a good reputation was that she had to be chaste; however, if she was liked by society, that requirement did not have as much weight. People believed a woman’s “'credit' or 'reputation' was identical with her chastity, and once lost was irrecoverable.” Chastity was the foundation that women’s reputations were built on; however, if she was chaste, society still had to approve of her. Society had to make a judgment call to determine whether or not a woman was worthy, and that judgment was based on “a woman’s ‘civility’, her ‘air’ or her ‘carriage’; or, above all, of the way that she dressed.” Once again, these are all vague terms that are hard to define and execute, and the belief that society was judging you all the time enforced the idea that women had to keep up appearances to get a good reputation. [1] 

[1] Dabhoiwala, Faramerz. “The Construction of Honour, Reputation and Status in Late Seventeenth- and Early Eighteenth-Century England.” Transactions of the Royal Historical Society, vol. 6, 1996, pp. 201–213. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/3679236.

Image Credit:

Bewick, Thomas. Fable of Genius, Virtue, and Reputation. 1776-1784. The British Museum.