EXHIBITS

What's in a Name?: Consolidation of Family Life After 1960

Array ( [0] => HIST 6020 Spring 2020 [1] => no-show )
buzz1949.jpg
A picture of the 1949 Home Economics Club.
(USU Archives Collection 25.5/7, p. 165)
buzz1965.jpg
The 1965 yearbook describes some of the purposes of the College of Family Life.
(USU Archives Collection 25.5/7, p. 23)

The 1960s and 1970s proved to be an important time of transition for the college. The once separate departments of Home Economics Education, Clothing and Textiles, and Home Economics and Management were merged together into Home Economics and Consumer Education. [1] The role of women had changed considerably from its conception in the early 20th century. Cooking and sewing were no longer the only relevant skills for women since opportunities in private industry were becoming more and more open. This change was reflected in the increased specialization of the degree requirements, although the general course offerings remained much the same.

Textiles, family development, and general home economics remained areas for students to expand their knowledge, but more emphasis was placed courses’ capacity to prepare students for the professional world. For instance, the Home Economics Education degree came to require courses in all the separate domains of home economics as well as courses in professional education because graduates with this major could go into either secondary education or professional education. [2] Similarly, the Foods Department became more focused on the science of nutrition and provided opportunities for professional development at events like food festivals. [3]

This corresponded to the changing role of extra-curricular organizations. Before the 1950s, extra-curricular organizations had been largely social ones. As university education became an essential step towards employment, extra-curricular organizations came to be critical for business and professional connections. [4] The type of labor that before had been limited to the home became a mainstay in industry as fashion, child-care, and consumer education became industries open to women.

[1] Gruenwald, Kim M. Our Living Legacy: Improving the Quality of Family Life. Logan: College of Family Life, 1988. p. 31
[2] Ibid. p. 35
[3] Ibid. p. 29-30
[4] Ibid. p. 31